Quarterly review

Retention after the price change

Executive summary

Retention held at 104% through the first full quarter on the new pricing. The average hides a split: enterprise expanded, mid-market did not renew.

The price change did not cost us the book — retention closed two points below plan and seven above the approved floor. The damage is concentrated: enterprise finished at 118%, mid-market at 96%, its first quarter below par since 2024, and eleven of its fourteen non-renewals named seat pricing.

Evidence at a glance
Net revenue retention
104%

vs 106% plan

Gross logo churn
2.1%

4-qtr avg 2.0%

Expansion ARR
$1.42M

up 31% on Q2

01

Where the quarter landed

Three quarters of the book renewed at list without an exception, and expansion revenue was the strongest we have recorded — almost all of it seat growth above 200 seats.

Net revenue retention by segment · Q3 2026
Enterprise118%
41 accounts · $6.9M · no non-renewals
Mid-market96%
163 accounts · $4.1M · 14 non-renewals
Self-serve89%
2,904 accounts · $1.3M · flat on Q2
02

What moved mid-market

Customer Success ran exit interviews on all fourteen non-renewals and on nine accounts that renewed after an escalation. The pattern is consistent.

  • Seat pricing punishes the shape of these teams. Mid-market accounts add occasional viewers, not daily editors. Eleven of fourteen were paying editor prices for people who log in twice a month.
  • Discount expiry did most of the work. Nine of the fourteen were on legacy discounts that lapsed in the same cycle, so the felt increase was 34%, not 9%.
  • Nobody left on product. Feature gaps came up in two of twenty-three conversations and were the stated reason in neither.
“We didn’t leave because it got expensive. We left because we couldn’t explain to finance what the extra money bought.” — Head of Operations · 240 seats · churned 14 Sep
03

The Q4 decision

Two proposals compete for the same pricing slot, and they are not compatible: both change what a mid-market account pays.

A viewer tier for 20–80 seat accounts — recommended

A read-and-comment seat at 30% of the editor price, capped at three per editor. Applied to the churned accounts it cuts invoices by a median of 22% and holds revenue on eleven of the fourteen: $310K given up against $1.1M of renewal risk. Billable by 20 November.

A second list increase in January — defer

The annual plan assumes a further 6% in January. Enterprise would absorb it; mid-market would see two increases in five months against the same lapsing discounts. The revenue is $840K; the risk is the segment.

Next steps

  1. Approve or reject the viewer tier

    Priya RamanDecision needed by 17 October

  2. Model the January increase against a segmented rollout

    Revenue OperationsDraft by 31 October

  3. Give every 20+ seat account a named renewal owner

    Marcus Lai, Customer SuccessIn place by 1 November